Comments on: Suds makes the soapy world less slippery http://kunxi.org/archives/2008/04/suds-makes-the-soapy-world-less-slippery/ Yet another code monkey blog. Wed, 04 Jan 2012 07:28:05 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Eric Dawson http://kunxi.org/archives/2008/04/suds-makes-the-soapy-world-less-slippery/comment-page-1/#comment-79887 Eric Dawson Mon, 09 May 2011 08:39:12 +0000 http://www.kunxi.org/?p=243#comment-79887 I think it would be great if adding WS-Security will be implied so that using the web is more secured. But im open on both I only want that the both parties will be developed well. Eric Dawson P.S. Mind if I leave a shameless plug? I'm the webmaster for freemasonrysecrets - <a href="http://freemasonrysecrets.com">Free mason secrets</a> I think it would be great if adding WS-Security will be implied so that using the web is more secured. But im open on both I only want that the both parties will be developed well.

Eric Dawson

P.S. Mind if I leave a shameless plug? I’m the webmaster for freemasonrysecrets – Free mason secrets

]]> By: bookstack http://kunxi.org/archives/2008/04/suds-makes-the-soapy-world-less-slippery/comment-page-1/#comment-41601 bookstack Sun, 06 Apr 2008 08:31:04 +0000 http://www.kunxi.org/?p=243#comment-41601 We may deal the same problem in different aspects. If the web service is deployed in the world wild web, WS-Security is preferred as the authentication. But in the Intranet, NTLM may prevail because it is no-brainer for the IT staff to configure, and the default setting of the SharePoint server. It does make sense to add WS-Security to suds, but may over engineer for integrating NTLM. NTLM is supposed to be supported in the layer of httplib, and transparent to the suds IMHO. We may deal the same problem in different aspects. If the web service is deployed in the world wild web, WS-Security is preferred as the authentication. But in the Intranet, NTLM may prevail because it is no-brainer for the IT staff to configure, and the default setting of the SharePoint server.

It does make sense to add WS-Security to suds, but may over engineer for integrating NTLM. NTLM is supposed to be supported in the layer of httplib, and transparent to the suds IMHO.

]]> By: Ramon http://kunxi.org/archives/2008/04/suds-makes-the-soapy-world-less-slippery/comment-page-1/#comment-41572 Ramon Sun, 06 Apr 2008 00:16:41 +0000 http://www.kunxi.org/?p=243#comment-41572 Hi -- I've contacted the suds developers to ask about adding WS-Security support, and they seem interested. Have you done the same? I'm looking for something like what is described in http://arsenalist.com/2007/01/27/python-client-for-web-services-using-ws-security/ but with the suds library... Ramon Hi –

I’ve contacted the suds developers to ask about adding WS-Security support, and they seem interested. Have you done the same? I’m looking for something like what is described in http://arsenalist.com/2007/01/27/python-client-for-web-services-using-ws-security/ but with the suds library…

Ramon

]]>