Comments on: Would you like a slice of pie? http://kunxi.org/archives/2007/08/would-you-like-a-slice-of-pie/ Yet another code monkey blog. Wed, 04 Jan 2012 07:28:05 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Brian Ray http://kunxi.org/archives/2007/08/would-you-like-a-slice-of-pie/comment-page-1/#comment-22045 Brian Ray Thu, 30 Aug 2007 14:01:43 +0000 http://www.kunxi.org/archives/2007/08/would-you-like-a-slice-of-pie/#comment-22045 Thanks for sharing. But, 3D graphs are something that, as a printing expert, I do not always like. For example perspective foreshortening can give mis-leading information about data. In the example here, there is a technical problem with the perspective, as well. The top of the graph should be lighter than the edges. I wonder if this is a problem with the render library or what. Take a closer look and see if you see what I mean. BTW, in the 2D realm and w. Python I prefer matplotlib. Regards, Brian Ray Thanks for sharing. But, 3D graphs are something that, as a printing expert, I do not always like. For example perspective foreshortening can give mis-leading information about data.

In the example here, there is a technical problem with the perspective, as well. The top of the graph should be lighter than the edges. I wonder if this is a problem with the render library or what. Take a closer look and see if you see what I mean.

BTW, in the 2D realm and w. Python I prefer matplotlib.

Regards, Brian Ray

]]> By: bookstack http://kunxi.org/archives/2007/08/would-you-like-a-slice-of-pie/comment-page-1/#comment-21834 bookstack Tue, 28 Aug 2007 13:44:41 +0000 http://www.kunxi.org/archives/2007/08/would-you-like-a-slice-of-pie/#comment-21834 Sumant: Could you list your browser version, dojo version, dojox.gfx3d version? Besides the DEPRECATED warning, have you seen any errors? Sumant:

Could you list your browser version, dojo version, dojox.gfx3d version?

Besides the DEPRECATED warning, have you seen any errors?

]]> By: Sumant http://kunxi.org/archives/2007/08/would-you-like-a-slice-of-pie/comment-page-1/#comment-21757 Sumant Mon, 27 Aug 2007 20:45:14 +0000 http://www.kunxi.org/archives/2007/08/would-you-like-a-slice-of-pie/#comment-21757 I downloaded your sample, but i can't see any chart. my browser just shows me this That's all Folks! And the debug window has the following EXPERIMENTAL: dojox.gfx.svg -- APIs subject to change without notice. DEPRECATED: dojo.declare: for class 'dojox.gfx.lighting.Model' pass initializer function as 'constructor' property instead of as a separate argument. -- will be removed in version: 1.0 DEPRECATED: dojo.declare: for class 'dojox.gfx3d.scheduler.BinarySearchTree' pass initializer function as 'constructor' property instead of as a separate argument. -- will be removed in version: 1.0 DEPRECATED: dojo.declare: for class 'dojox.gfx3d.Object' pass initializer function as 'constructor' property instead of as a separate argument. -- will be removed in version: 1.0 DEPRECATED: dojo.declare: for class 'dojox.gfx3d.Scene' pass initializer function as 'constructor' property instead of as a separate argument. -- will be removed in version: 1.0 DEPRECATED: dojo.declare: for class 'dojox.gfx3d.Edges' pass initializer function as 'constructor' property instead of as a separate argument. -- will be removed in version: 1.0 DEPRECATED: dojo.declare: for class 'dojox.gfx3d.Orbit' pass initializer function as 'constructor' property instead of as a separate argument. -- will be removed in version: 1.0 DEPRECATED: dojo.declare: for class 'dojox.gfx3d.Path3d' pass initializer function as 'constructor' property instead of as a separate argument. -- will be removed in version: 1.0 DEPRECATED: dojo.declare: for class 'dojox.gfx3d.Triangles' pass initializer function as 'constructor' property instead of as a separate argument. -- will be removed in version: 1.0 DEPRECATED: dojo.declare: for class 'dojox.gfx3d.Quads' pass initializer function as 'constructor' property instead of as a separate argument. -- will be removed in version: 1.0 Any ideas ? I downloaded your sample, but i can’t see any chart.

my browser just shows me this

That’s all Folks!

And the debug window has the following

EXPERIMENTAL: dojox.gfx.svg — APIs subject to change without notice.
DEPRECATED: dojo.declare: for class ‘dojox.gfx.lighting.Model’ pass initializer function as ‘constructor’ property instead of as a separate argument. — will be removed in version: 1.0
DEPRECATED: dojo.declare: for class ‘dojox.gfx3d.scheduler.BinarySearchTree’ pass initializer function as ‘constructor’ property instead of as a separate argument. — will be removed in version: 1.0
DEPRECATED: dojo.declare: for class ‘dojox.gfx3d.Object’ pass initializer function as ‘constructor’ property instead of as a separate argument. — will be removed in version: 1.0
DEPRECATED: dojo.declare: for class ‘dojox.gfx3d.Scene’ pass initializer function as ‘constructor’ property instead of as a separate argument. — will be removed in version: 1.0
DEPRECATED: dojo.declare: for class ‘dojox.gfx3d.Edges’ pass initializer function as ‘constructor’ property instead of as a separate argument. — will be removed in version: 1.0
DEPRECATED: dojo.declare: for class ‘dojox.gfx3d.Orbit’ pass initializer function as ‘constructor’ property instead of as a separate argument. — will be removed in version: 1.0
DEPRECATED: dojo.declare: for class ‘dojox.gfx3d.Path3d’ pass initializer function as ‘constructor’ property instead of as a separate argument. — will be removed in version: 1.0
DEPRECATED: dojo.declare: for class ‘dojox.gfx3d.Triangles’ pass initializer function as ‘constructor’ property instead of as a separate argument. — will be removed in version: 1.0
DEPRECATED: dojo.declare: for class ‘dojox.gfx3d.Quads’ pass initializer function as ‘constructor’ property instead of as a separate argument. — will be removed in version: 1.0

Any ideas ?

]]> By: Masashi http://kunxi.org/archives/2007/08/would-you-like-a-slice-of-pie/comment-page-1/#comment-21709 Masashi Mon, 27 Aug 2007 07:13:52 +0000 http://www.kunxi.org/archives/2007/08/would-you-like-a-slice-of-pie/#comment-21709 Looks great! It's very useful. Looks great!
It’s very useful.

]]>